Like what others have said I think a lot falls on the species/type of animal and the husbandry.
I think there are some animals that really shouldn’t be kept as “pets” for a variety of reasons. For example, most monkeys make for very bad pets due to their high enrichment needs, and most are wild-caught, which is a very unethical business in most cases, plus you’re bound to end up with a sick and/or unadjusted pet. There are some people who can pull it off but for 99.9% of people it’s just not achievable simply due to them having a job/social life/other hobbies/not nearly enough money. For other pets like dogs or hamsters, yes, I’d say most people can handle them. I know a lot depends on the species/breed, which is where research and good husbandry comes into play, but for most people* you will not need to spend years getting the animal adjusted to human contact or tens of thousands of dollars just for basic needs.
* There are some pets (especially special needs pets or ones adopted from rough situations) that do need this. All I’m saying is it’s not the majority like it would be for most wild-caught animals.
And, like everyone else said, good husbandry is really going to be a bottom line in all of this. If you can benefit an animal’s life by providing them food, shelter, enrichment, affection, health care, etc that would be better than what they’d get out in the wild then that’s a plus to me. For some animals, they’re better off out in the wild because we can’t provide for them as easily.
(And of course, some wild animals can’t be returned for a variety of reasons. In these cases, though, this should be left to a professional wildlife rehabilitator, not your average pet owner.)
Edited by Robin~, 13 December 2021 - 04:50 AM.